Referencias bibliográficas para el curso
En esta lista incluimos los artículos recomendados
para el material de
la clases. Estan listados en el orden de temas según el programa del
curso. En cada bloque hemos marcado al menos uno (» ) por
considerarlo
básico en esa categoria. Si disponemos de PDFs, hemos incluido
un enlace.
Cualquier selección de referencias en un curso siempre obedece a opiniones sobre lo que uno considera epistemológica y metodológicamente apropiado y congruente con alguna filosofía de investigación. En términos generales, si una referencia no está, es muy seguramente por que no la consideramos compatible con la orientación filosófica de este curso. Algunos articulos de todos modos los listamos pero en una sección neutral: Aplicaciones. Incluso nuestras malas aplicaciones ahi están! Con el tiempo, lo que uno debe hacer como estudiante es estudiar "todas" las referencias de un tema para percibir los contrastes en las orientaciones filosóficas y metodológicas de diferentes escuelas y grupos de investigación! Por lo pronto, aqui esta nuestra selección de referencias.
De vez en cuando sigo agregando referencias a la lista, aunque no siempre tengo el PDF. Asi que cualquier otro PDF que encuentren y gusten mandarmelo para ponerlos en linea aqui, se los agradeceré.
INTRODUCCION
Adams DC, FJ Rohlf & DE Slice. 2013. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix [doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6283].
Bookstein F L, Slice D
E, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. 2004. Anthropology
takes control of morphometrics. Coll. Antropol. 28 Suppl 2:121-32.
Marcus, L. F. 1990. Traditional Morphometrics.
En: F. J. Rohlf
&
F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics
Workshop. Special Publication 2, The University of Michigan Museum of
Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 77-122.
» Mitteroeker P. & P. Gunz. 2009. Advances in Geometric Morphometrics.
Evol. Biol. DOI 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x
Reyment et al 1984. Chp
4 Some simple forerunners of
multivariate morphometrics. En: Reyment, R. A., R. E. Blackith & N.
A. Campbell. Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press, London.
pp 27-31.
Rohlf, F. J. 1990.
Morphometrics. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 21: 299-316.
» Slice, D. E. 2007. Geometric Morphometrics.
Annual Review of
Anthropology 36: 261-281.
Snedecor, G.W. 1954. Chp
1 Biometry, its makers and
concepts. En:
Kempthorne, O. et al (ed) Satistics and Mathematics in Biology. Iiowa
State College Press. pp 3-10.
Strauss, R. E. 2010. Chp 16. Prospectus: The Future of Morphometrics. En: Elewa AMT (ed). Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 124. Springer-Verlag. pp 345-352.
PROBABILIDAD Y ESCALAS
» Giere, R.N. 1979. Chp 9. Statistics, Correlations, and
Causal
Hypotheses. En: "Understanding Scientific Reasoning". Holt,
Rinehart & Winston. P165-183.
Giere, R.N. 1979. Chp 11. Testing Statistical
Hypotheses. En:
Understanding Scientific Reasoning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
P 209-246.
Goldstein, M & I.F. Goldstein. 1978. Chp 10.
Measurement and its
pitfalls. En: "How we know, an exploration of the scientific process"
Da Capo Press, New York. pp 231-241.
» Houle, D. C. Pelabon, G. P. Wagner, T. F. Hansen. 2011. Measurement and meaning in biology. Quarterly Review of Biology 86:1-32.
Mayo, D.G. 1996. Chp
1. Learning from error. En: "Error and the growth
of experimental knowledge" The University of Chicago Press. pp
1-20.
Wild C.J. & M. Pfannkuch. 1999. Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review 67:
223-265.
IMAGENES
Belleghem et al . 2017. patternize: An R package for quantifying colour pattern variation. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;1–9.
Costa, L. F. & Cesar, R. M. 2001. Chp 3. Shape
acquisition and
processing. P 197-217. En: Shape analysis and Classification. Theory
and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl. Pp 659.
Klein A, Ghosh SS, Bao FS, Giard J, Häme Y, Stavsky E, et al. 2017. Mindboggling morphometry of human brains. PLoS Comput Biol 13(2): e1005350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005350
MacLeod, N.
1990. Chp. 2. Digital images and automated image
analysis systems. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.).
Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication
# 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp.
21-35.
» Rohlf, F. J. 1990. Chp. 3. An overview of image
processing and analysis
techniques for morphometrics. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein
(eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop.
Special Publication # 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of
Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp. 37-60.
VECTORES
Costa, Lda Fontura & Cesar, R. M. 2001. Chp. 2.2.
Basic
mathematical concepts. Linear Algebra. En: Shape analysis and
Classification. Theory and Practice. CRC Press. Pp 51-90.
» Wickens, T. D. 1995.
Chp. 2. Some vector geometry. En: The
Geometry of Multivariate Statistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publ.
Hillsdale NJ. Pp 9-30.
Lattin, J, J.D Carroll & P.E Green. 2003. Chp 2. Vectors and Matrices. En: Analyzing Multivariate Data. Brooks/Cole. pp 19-37.
Manly, B. F.J. 1986. Chp. 2. Matrix Algebra. En:
Multivariate Statistical Methods. A primer. Chapman and Hall. pp 17-25.
????. Chp 15. Mathematical tools for multivariate
character analysis.
Pp 333-353. {alguien tendrá los detalles de la referencia
bibliográfica?}
Zheng, Yuxi. ????. Chapter 1 Vectors and Tensors. ???? {alguien tendrá los detalles de la referencia
bibliográfica?}
MÉTODOS DE REGISTRO DE MARCAS
Albert MH, et al 2003.
Assessing landmark influence on shape variation. Biometrika 90(3):669–78
Bookstein, F. L., R. E. Straus, J. M. Humpries, B.
Chernoff, R. L.
Elder and G. R. Smith. 1982. A comment upon the uses of Fourier methods
in Systematics. Systematic Zoology 31: 85-92.
Dickinson et al. 1987. Another approach to leaf shape
comparisons. Taxon 36: 1-20.
Fink, W. 1990. Chp 1 Data acquisition for morphometric
analysis in
Systematic Biology. En: Rohlf J & F. L. Bookstein. Proceedings of
the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2, The
University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. Ann Arbor. P 9-19.
McLellan, T. & J. A. Endler. 1998. The
relative success of
some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects.
Systematic Biology 47: 264-281.
» Mousseau, T. A. 1991. Landmarks in Morphometrics, or
shape and size of Morphometrics to come. Evolution 45: 1979-1980
Navarro, N, X. Zatarain & S. Montuire.
2004. Effects of morphometric descriptor changes on statistical
classification and morphospaces. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 83: 243-260.
» O´Higgins, P. O. 2010. Chp 4. Methodological issues in the
description of
forms. En: P. E. Lestrel (ed). Fourier descriptors and their
applications in Biology. Cambridge University Press. pp 74-105.
Sheets, HD, et al. 2006. Comparison
of geometric
morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related
differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology 3: 15.
Strauss, R.E. & F.L. Bookstein. 1982. The truss:
Body form reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31:
113-135.
ESPACIOS MORFOMETRICOS Y PROYECCIONES
» Adams, D.C. F.J Rohlf
& D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics:
Ten Years of progress following the ´revolution´. Italian Journal of
Zoology 71: 5-16.
Bookstein, F. L. 1996. Combining the tools of
Geometric morphometrics.
En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds). Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 131-151
Bookstein, F. L. 1982. Foundations of Morphometrics.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 451-470.
Kendall, DG.
1984. Shape
manifolds, Procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces.
Bull. London Math. Soc. 16: 81-121.
Monteiro, L. R. , B. Bordin & S. F. dos Reis.
2000. Shape
distances, shape spaces and the comparison of morphometric methods.
TREE 15:217- 220.
Monteiro, L.R. , L.H. Guillermo & L.A. Rivera. 2003. Shape spaces, metrics and linear models for evolutionary rates. In: Mondiani, R (org). Proceedings of the 2nd Brazilian Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Biology. Rio de Janeiro. p. 179-207.
Richtsmeier, J. T. V. B. Deleon & S. R. Lele.
2002. The promise of
Geometric Morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 45: 68-91.
» Rohlf, F. J. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape
components and the
effects of linear transformations. En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds).
Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 117-129.
» Rohlf FJ. 1999. Shape Statistics: Procrustes
Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces. J. Classification 16: 197-223.
Rohlf, F. J. and L. F. Marcus. 1993. A revolution in
Morphometrics. TREE 8(4): 129-132.
Rohlf, FJ & FL Bookstein 2003. Computing the
Uniform Component of Shape Variation. Syst. Biol. 52: 66-69.
Slice, D. E. 2001. Landmark Coordinates Aligned by
Procrustes Analysis
do not lie in Kendall’s Shape Space. Syst. Biol 50: 141-149.
Slice, D. E. 2005. Chp. 1. Modern Morphometrics. En:
Slice, D. E. (ed).
Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic/ PLenum
Press. New York. pp 1-45.
Torcida S & SI Pérez. 2012. Análisis de Procrustes y el estudio de la variación morfológica. Revista Argentina de Antropología Biológica 14: 131-141.
Zelditch et al 2004. Chp. 1. Introduction. En:
Zelditch ML, Swiderski,
HD Sheets & WL Fink. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A
primer. Elsevier Academic Press.
ESTADISTICA
Chatfield, C. 1988.
Chp 5. Analysing the data. General strategy. En:
Problem solving: a statistician’s guide. Chapmann and Hall, p 13-21.
Fruciano, C. 2016. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes Evol. DOI 10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4
» Goodall, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shpae. J. Royal Satistical Soc. Series B. 53: 285-339
Klingenberg C.P. & L.R. Monteiro. 2005. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: Implications for morphometric applications. Systematic Biology 54:
678-688.
Lele, S & J. T. Richtsmeier, 1990. Statistical
models in Morphometrics: are they realistic?. Systematic Zoology: 39:
60-69.
Lewontin, R.C. 1966. On the measurement of
relative variability. Systematic Zoology 141-142.
Mayr E. 1969. Chp 8, The qualitative and quantitative
analysis of
variation, En: "Principles of Systematic Zoology" McGraw-Hill. Pp
144-197.
Monteiro l, & JL Gomes. 2005.Morphological divergence rate tests for natural selection: Uncertainty of parameter estimation and robustness of results. Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 (2): 345-355.
Rohlf, F.J. 1971. Perspectives on the Application of Multivariate Statistics to Taxonomy. Taxon 20: 85-90.
Strauss RE & MN Atanassov. 2006. Determining best
complete subsets
of specimens and characters for multivariate morphometric studies in
the presence of large amounts of missing data. Biol. J. Linnean Soc.
88: 309-328.
» Strauss RE. 2010. Chp 4. Discriminating groups of organisms. En: Elewa AMT (ed). Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 124. Springer-Verlag. pp 73-91.
SYSTAT. 1992. Chp 1 Introduction to statistics. En:
"Statistics Manual" Systat Inc.
Stanley, J. 1963. Chp 12 The Analysis of Variance. En:
The essence of biometry. McGill University Press. Montreal. P 120-126.
» Van Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation.
Evolutionary Theory 4: 33-43.
» Zar, J. H. 1996. Chp 1 Introduction, Chp 2 Populations
and samples. Chp
3 Measures of central tendency, Chp 4 Measures of Dispersion and
Variability. En: "Biostatistical Analysis" Prentice Hall. P1-45.
METODOS DE ORDENACIÓN
Albrecht, G. H. 1979. The study of Biological versus
Statistical
variation in multivariate morphometrics: the descriptive use of
multiple regression analysis. Systematic Zoology 28: 338-344.
Chatfield, C. 1988.
Appendix A.13 A digest of statistical
techniques. Multivariate analysis. En: Problem solving. A
statistician's guide. Chapman and Hall. p219-222.
» Campbell, N. A. & W. R. Atchley. 1981. The
geometry of canonical variate analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 268-280.
James, F. C. & C. E. McCulloch. 1990. Multivariate
analysis in
ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's box. Ann. Rev. Ecol.
Syst. 21: 129-166.
Rohlf, F. J. & F. L. Bookstein. 1987. A comment on
shearing as a
method for "size correction". Systematic Zoology 36: 356-367.
Somers, K. M. 1989. Allometry, Isometry and shape in
Principal Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 169-173.
Sundberg P. 1989. Shape and size-constrained Principal
Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 166-168.
APLICACIONES
Aguilar-Medrano R, B. Frédérich, E. De Luna & E. Balart-Paez. 2011.
Patterns of morphological evolution of the cephalic region in Damselfishes (Perciformes, Pomacentridae) of the Eastern Pacific. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102 (3): 593-613.
Becerra JM, Valdecasas AG. 2004. Landmark superimposition for taxonomic identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 267-274.
Cardillo M. 2010. Some Applications of Geometric Morphometrics
to Archaeology. Chp 15. Morphometrics to Nonmorphometricians. (Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences). Edited by Ashraf M. T. Elewa. p. 325-341.
Catalano SA, Ercoli M, Prevosti FJ. 2015. The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in Musteloids. Systematic Biology 64: 294-306.
Chollet-Villalpando J.G. y E. De Luna. 2020. A geometric morphometric approach for disparity of the sulcus acusticus of sagitta in species of Gerreidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Organisms Diversity and Evolution. DOI: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13127-019-00429-9
Close R. A & E.J. Rayfield. 2012. Functional Morphometric Analysis of the Furcula in Mesozoic Birds. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36664. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0036664.
De Luna, E. 2020. Integrando análisis morfométricos y filogenéticos: de la sistemática fenética a la morfometría filogenética. Acta Botanica Mexicana 127: e1640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm127.2020.1640
Foster D.J. J. Podos & A.P. Hendry. 2007. A geometric morphometric appraisal of beak shape in Darwin’s finches. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 263-275..
Keller, R.A., C. Peeters & P. Beldade. 2014. Evolution of thorax architecture in ant castes highlights trade-off between flight and ground behaviors. eLife doi
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.015391971.
Kellner, J. R. & R. A. Alford. 2003. The ontogeny
of Fluctuating Asymmetry. The American Naturalist 161: 931-947.
Rohlf, MacLeod N. 2002. Phylogenetic signals in morphometric data. In MacLeod, N. & P. T. Forey, P.T. (Eds.) Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny (pp. 100-138). London: Taylor & Francis.
Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Windhager S, Schaefer K. 2013. A brief review of shape, form and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology. Italian Journal of Mammalogy 24: 59-66.
Monteiro LR. 2013. Morphometrics and the comparative method: studying the evolution of biological shape. Hystrix 24: 25-32.
Ospina-Garcés, S. & E. De Luna. 2017. Phylogenetic analysis of landmark data and the morphological evolution of cranial shape and diets in species of Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Zoomorphology 136: 251-265.
Pelabon, C., T. F. Hansen, A. J. R. Carter, & D. Houle. 2010. Evolution of variation and variability under fluctuating, stabilizing, and disruptive selection. Evolution 64:1912-1925.
Ramírez-Sánchez MM, E. De Luna & C. Cramer. 2016. Geometric and traditional morphometrics for the assessment of character state identity: multivariate statistical analyses of character variation in the water mite genus Arrenurus (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Arrenuridae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177: 720-749.
Simpson et al 1960. Chp 15 Growth. En: Simpson, G. G.,
A. Roe & R.
C. Lewontin. "Quantitative Zoology". Harcourt, Brace and Company,
New York. P373-420.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Chp1 The size of
living things, Chp 2
Problems of size and scale, Chp 3 The use of allometry. En: Scaling.
Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
P 1-32.
Solis-Zurita C., E. De Luna & D. González. 2019. Phylogenetic relationships in the Sceloporus variabilis (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae) complex based on three molecular markers, continuous characters, and geometric morphometric data. Zoologica Scripta 48:419–439. DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12349
|
